CIO, cut your D365 F&O AMS budget by 60 to 80% with AI
Your D365 AMS eats 30 to 50% of your annual ERP budget with no result commitment. And you stay locked in with the integrator that owns the knowledge.
CIOs, cut your Dynamics 365 F&O AMS by 60-80% with AI. Fixed €200/ticket, code in your Azure DevOps, governance reclaimed.
Three problems any CIO under a D365 AMS contract will recognize
- ✗The AMS contract guarantees human availability, not resolution. SLAs are on acknowledgement time, never on delivery.
- ✗Per-ticket cost is opaque: the same development can cost €800 or €8,000 depending on the assigned profile and reported time.
- ✗Switching vendors costs €30,000 to €80,000 in knowledge transfer — which kills competition and locks margins.
- ✗Technical governance escapes you: no code review, no automated tests, no visibility on debt.
Take back control of your D365 AMS — fixed cost, code in your repo, your IT validates
- ✓Single price: €200 per resolved ticket (AI develops exactly what was defined during needs analysis and tests pass — ticket handled + code made available), regardless of complexity or D365 F&O module.
- ✓No billing if the ticket is not merged into your Azure DevOps — you carry zero overrun risk.
- ✓Code stays in YOUR Azure DevOps repo. You can switch to another vendor at any time — or fully bring it in-house.
- ✓Consolidated reporting: tickets submitted, resolved, pending, accumulated cost — for your budget and governance committees.
How it works
Submit your ticket
Describe the business or technical need in a few lines. No 50-page spec required.
AI generates the extension
X++ code, unit tests and documentation produced in under 48 hours.
Validation on your Azure DevOps
Pull request submitted on your repository. Your IT lead reviews and validates before merge.
Delivered — you pay €200
Once merged, it's delivered. No billing if the ticket isn't resolved.
Why it's worth it for you
A typical €150-300k/year D365 AMS budget for 100-200 tickets drops to €20-40k with Skalp AI.
Operational risk is reversed: Skalp AI bears the cost of failure, not your IT department.
No technical dependency: you keep full control and can re-internalize or switch vendors without hidden cost.
Frequently asked questions
How do I justify switching from classic AMS to Skalp AI to my exec committee?+
What happens to my current AMS contract if I switch to Skalp AI?+
How do you handle security and data sovereignty?+
Which KPIs can I track to steer Skalp AI at CIO level?+
Related pages
To go deeper on the same topic, seen from other angles.