Technical Director / CTO · Architecture, code quality and D365 technical debt

Technical Director, take back control of your D365 code quality

Your D365 developments carry technical debt: forgotten over-layering, untested code, ignored conventions. Every Microsoft upgrade becomes a risk.

TL;DR

Technical Director, demand clean D365 F&O code: 0 over-layering, SysTest, XppBP. AI aligns on your in-house conventions. €200/ticket.

Join the waitlist
Microsoft D365 F&O expertise
10 ans
D365 F&O
€200 / ticket
Fixed price per resolved ticket
vs €800-1,200 at a typical SI
48 h
Average delivery time
Azure DevOps
Validated by your IT
The problem with your current vendor

Why D365 code quality delivered by SIs stays opaque

  • SIs rarely deliver with SysTest unit tests: code is validated in manual UAT, never in CI.
  • Naming conventions and Microsoft extension patterns (CoC, event handlers) are applied inconsistently.
  • Over-layering is still used at some integrators despite official Microsoft deprecation — creating upgrade debt.
  • No systematic code review: Pull Requests merged without XppBP / FxCop / SonarQube gating.
How SKALP solves it

Microsoft-aligned, tested and versioned code — as you would have written it

  • Generation exclusively in extension pattern: table extensions, classes, CoC, event handlers. No over-layering.
  • SysTest unit tests delivered with every ticket, runnable in your Azure DevOps pipeline.
  • Naming and project-structure conventions aligned with YOUR standards (existing-code analysis before generation).
  • Code passing XppBP (Best Practice) and FxCop rules enabled in your CI — no post-delivery rework.

How it works

1

Submit your ticket

Describe the business or technical need in a few lines. No 50-page spec required.

2

AI generates the extension

X++ code, unit tests and documentation produced in under 48 hours.

3

Validation on your Azure DevOps

Pull request submitted on your repository. Your IT lead reviews and validates before merge.

4

Delivered — you pay €200

Once merged, it's delivered. No billing if the ticket isn't resolved.

Why it's worth it for you

0%
of over-layering generated

100% of delivered code is in a Microsoft-supported extension pattern — your One Version upgrades pass without intervention.

100%
of tickets delivered with SysTest tests

Unit coverage ready to run in your CI pipeline — you can enforce a minimum threshold in your branch policies.

YOUR
naming conventions respected

The AI analyzes your existing code to align style (prefixes, organization model, class structure) with your in-house standards.

Frequently asked questions

How does the AI respect my in-house guidelines?+
Before each generation, the AI analyzes your Azure DevOps repo: class naming conventions, model organization, extension structure, recurring patterns. If you formalize your guidelines in a README or shared document, you can reference it on the ticket so they are applied.
What happens if the code fails my review?+
You comment on the Pull Request with your remarks; the AI produces a revised version within 24 h. If after 2-3 iterations the ticket does not meet your quality bar, it is requalified or dropped — without billing. You retain full control over the "acceptable" criterion.
Can Skalp AI generate code compliant with Microsoft Acceptance Test Library (ATL)?+
Yes. Generated tests can use ATL (Microsoft Acceptance Test Library) in addition to SysTest, leveraging helpers for data setup, isolation and assertions. If your test strategy relies on ATL, mention it in the ticket description.
How do I prevent my code from being used to train the AI?+
By default, your code is never used for model training. AI processing is inference-only, in an isolated environment. This contractual commitment is stated in the DPA (Data Processing Agreement) signed before any kickoff.

Submit your first ticket

€200 if resolved. Nothing if not resolved.

Join the waitlist